Sunday, October 6, 2013

71. A New Curriculum for the MEd. Programme


[Kerala University English Teacher Educator’s Forum - KUETEF]


The NCTE  Curriculum Framework-1998 took stock of  the context and concerns  of teacher education ranging from ‘constitutional goals’ to  ‘commitment  and performance in teacher  education’; it emphasized the symbiotic  relationship between pre-service and in-service teacher education and recommended updated curricula for teacher education  for various levels of school education from the primary stage to the senior secondary stage-for academic  and vocational streams. Envisaging  teacher preparation  for alternative  systems, special education and physical education, the  1998 Framework emphasized pedagogical analysis and the sue of context-based, specific  transaction strategies...

The University Grants Commission has the mandate to promote excellence in the higher  education sector including the academic and the professional. In the context of Education, its task is more comprehensive than that of other regulatory bodies. It looks after and supports excellence in the discipline of Education in its liberal – academic, as well as  professional endeavours. “Not to swim is to fall back” is a worthwhile and pragmatic approach to the task of curriculum updating. At any point of time, curriculum updating has to take stock of the changes and challenges that emerge because of developments in various sectors of our national life as well as on the international scenario.


  [1.0.  Preamble, Updating Curricula  in Education. Model -UGC]




MEd. Curriculum Meeting held on 04  October 2013

Prof. A. Teresa Susan, Head, Department of Education, Dean Faculty of Education and Chairman Board of Studies in Education, PG, convened a meeting  to  review the  MEd. Curriculum on 04 October in the Department of  Education.

Prof. Susan had  expressed her concern at the   material already evolved thorough  previous meetings and  wanted the newly invited experts which included myself, to  suggest essential modifications.  Copies of  syllabuses  already prepared  were  distributed to the members present for whetting.  

Many members present  had sought  clarification   regarding  the   Course  Structure which appeared to be slightly  unclear. Accordingly,   one  of the members  present,  Dr. Asha who  is currently serving  as  the Hon. Director, Curriculum Development Centre, gave the following clarification:

The Choice-based Credit and Semester (CBCS)  in not operational in the University now. Instead only   a  Credit  and Semester System (CSS) is now being implemented.  For the PG programme  the  duration-content- evaluation  would  be as stated below:

* Each semester would comprise  110 working days.
* The two semesters  would  thus comprise  220 working days.
* The  MEd. Course would comprise Core Papers, Compulsory Electives and  a large number of  electives.
 * Each paper  carries  four  Credit
* With regard to  the  ratio  for  Internal and External  assessment  the  one now being followed is:

Institution           External  Ass.                         Internal  Ass.

Department of Ed.        60                                            40
Colleges                         70                                            30

During the ensuing discussions,  several observations  were made and  the experts in different fields  were directed to incorporate them in  the  papers  prescribed for study  at the MEd. level.   A few important   recommendations made by the participants  include the following:


* All  the  papers prescribed for study should  not be merely an extension of the newly  revised BEd. curriculum of the University of Kerala. Focus should be on inclusion of advanced  theoretical knowledge.

* Basically all the Papers should  focus  on  research  and  should make  specific mention  of ways of developing  an  ability for research  in  the  students.

* The content  prescribed should  be  current  and  on completion of the course  the  student should be capable  of  developing  those qualities  a  Teacher Educator ought  to possess. In this  connection, the following  observation made regarding approaches to developing Course Content  by the UGC mentioned below is significant:

The post graduate programme (M.Ed.) must prepare specialists in all aspects of school education who can man the various professional slots in the system like  teaching, headship, inspection, planning and management. The curriculum must include action research exercises pertaining not only for the classroom level but also all the possible higher level.

[3.3. MA in Education- Professional Studies in Education- Model- UGC]

* The papers prescribed should  definitely address both  Methodology and Pedagogy.

* Mention should  be made in each papers regarding  essential  field experience.  Practice in BEd. classrooms  may be included.

*There is an urgent need to develop in the students a proper learning culture and  an ability to become  independent learners.

* A techno-pedagogic  approach  has not yet been  included   in  the pedagogic  strategies  already mentioned  viz- face-to-face instruction, Discussions, Seminar Presentations, Practicums and Dissertation.

* The techno-based  approach  should  focus on the following:
-Content delivery  including  communication of content
-Content  Collection  from different sources
-Content sharing  including  the conference mode
-Content evaluation

* A four phased  approach  should form the  backbone of the entire MEd. Curriculum. That is, it should  focus on

-Teaching
-Learning
-Design( of materials for  transaction of  content  by the participants of the course)
-Research

* It is worth considering the idea of making  Educational Technology  a compulsory paper for the MEd course.
* The  entire curriculum  should  try to address the  ‘employability’ issue. This  means not  just  sensitizing the participants to the issue but developing in them an ability to  identify ways of addressing issues related  to employability while transacting the secondary school curriculum.

* New  electives  on  Life Skills,  Educational Management,  Leadership  and Entrepreneurship  should be incorporated.  Papers  can also be suggested  to be completed as Self Study by  the students.

* There is a need  to  introduce papers focussing  on  Inter-disciplinary Study.

* Special  emphasis need to be given to   sensitizing the participants  to ways of nurturing  Multiple Intelligence  while transacting   different  subjects prescribed for study at the school level.

* Making students    compulsorily  do  an Online course  [offered through MOOC] as part of Practicum it was observed, would not only help  participants familiarize with the new  concept but also   update themselves with the   emerging ways of   teaching and learning.

* Though  the  Technology Lab  is not  properly functioning, participants of the MEd.  programme  need to be given hands on experience. If necessary  the  resources and  services of the Finishing School  set up by the Government of Kerala,  could be  sought by the University.

*There  is an urgent need  to sensitize  participants  to  ways of conducting research  Online and through the use of  specially  designed  tools  such as Google Docs and SSPS.

* The weightage now being  given to assignments and  Seminars  have to be reduced.

Dr.C. Praveen
Secretary, KUETEF





No comments:

Post a Comment